Acta Scientific Dental Sciences (ISSN: 2581-4893)

Research Article Volume 4 Issue 11

Machine Learning in Multidimensional Biomarker Design: A Milestone in Precision Medicine - A Systematic Review

Raajasiri Iyengar1 and Gaurav2*

1Final Year Undergraduate Student, NSVK Sri Venkateshwara Dental College and Hospital, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
2Consultant Oral Physician and Maxillofacial Radiologist, Assistant Professor, Department of Oral Medicine and Maxillofacial Radiology, NSVK Sri Venkateshwara Dental College and Hospital, Bangalore, Karnataka, India

*Corresponding Author: Raajasiri Iyengar, Final Year Undergraduate Student, NSVK Sri Venkateshwara Dental College and Hospital, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.

Received: September 08, 2020; Published: October 14, 2020

×

Abstract

Background: With the emerging era of precision medicine and high-throughput sequencing technologies, huge amount of ‘omics’ data has been gathered. Data interpretation remains a challenge due to the large and evolving magnitude of the dataset [3]. Precision medicine not only includes targeted therapeutics, but also necessitates ‘precision diagnostics’. Rational design of multidimensional biomarkers is the keystone of precision diagnostics, wherein multiple biomarkers are cumulatively assessed using computational techniques to yield specific patterns [1]. Patterns thus obtained are analyzed with Machine learning algorithms to arrive at a diagnosis that is both reliable and accurate.

Aim of the Study: To determine the role of Machine Learning in the rational design of multidimensional biomarkers.

Research Question: Can Machine Learning enable rational design of multidimensional biomarkers which serve as molecular signatures for specific disease states?

Materials and Methods: With the Medline database and Cochrane Collaboration taken as a source for authenticated scientific research data, 45 articles were selected having undergone randomized control trial. Out of these, 14 articles (studies) were chosen which met the criteria for systematic review.

Results and Conclusion: Machine learning enables identification of molecular signatures of specific disease states, by cumulative interpretation of multiple biomarkers simultaneously.

ML Algorithms can discover higher-order interactions among biomarkers, greatly improving the diagnostic performance.

Keywords: Multidimensional Biomarkers; Machine Learning; Rational Design; Precision Medicine

×

References

  1. Ko J., et al. “Machine learning to detect signatures of disease in liquid biopsies - a user's guide”. Lab on a Chip3 (2018): 395-405.
  2. P Zhang., et al. “Integrated biomedical data analysis utilizing various types of data for biomarkers identification". 2017 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM), Kansas City, MO (2017): 1469-1475.
  3. Shendure J and Aiden E. “The expanding scope of DNA sequencing”. Nature Biotechnology 30 (2012): 1084-1094.
  4. Goecks J., et al. “How Machine Learning Will Transform Biomedicine”. Cell1 (2020): 92‐101.
  5. Mamoshina P., et al. “Machine Learning on Human Muscle Transcriptomic Data for Biomarker Discovery and Tissue-Specific Drug Target Identification”. Frontiers in Genetics 9 (2018): 242.
  6. Kourou K., et al. Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal 13 (2015): 8-17
  7. Pratik Shah., et al. “Artificial intelligence and machine learning in clinical development: a translational perspective”. Digital Medicine (2019).
  8. ADAM Genomics Schema - Extension for Precision Medicine Research DH '18: Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Digital Health (2018)
  9. Blatti C., et al. “Knowledge-guided analysis of "omics" data using the KnowEnG cloud platform”. PLoS Biology (2020).
  10. Beerenwinkel N., et al. “Computational Cancer Biology: An Evolutionary Perspective”. PLoS Computation Biology 2 (2016): e1004717.
  11. Litjens G., et al. “Deep learning as a tool for increased accuracy and efficiency of histopathological diagnosis”. Scientific Report 6 (2016): 26286.
  12. Mariani M., et al. “Integrated Multidimensional Analysis Is Required for Accurate Prognostic Biomarkers in Colorectal Cancer”. PLoS ONE7 (2014): e101065.
  13. Kourou K., et al. “Machine learning applications in cancer prognosis and prediction”. Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal 13 (2014): 8‐17.
  14. Cruz JA and Wishart DS. “Applications of machine learning in cancer prediction and prognosis”. Cancer Information 2 (2007): 59‐77.
  15. Bashiri A., et al. “Improving the Prediction of Survival in Cancer Patients by Using Machine Learning Techniques: Experience of Gene Expression Data: A Narrative Review”. Iranian Journal of Public Health2 (2017): 165‐172.
  16. Huang S., et al. “Artificial intelligence in cancer diagnosis and prognosis: Opportunities and challenges”. Cancer Letter 471 (2020): 61‐71.
  17. Azencott CA. “Machine learning and genomics: precision medicine versus patient privacy”. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 2128 (2018): 20170350.
  18. Grapov D., et al. “Rise of Deep Learning for Genomic, Proteomic, and Metabolomic Data Integration in Precision Medicine”. OMICS 10 (2018): 630‐636.
  19. Krittanawong C., et al. “Artificial Intelligence in Precision Cardiovascular Medicine”. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 21 (2017): 2657‐2664.
  20. Fan S., et al. “Machine Learning Methods in Precision Medicine Targeting Epigenetic Diseases”. Current Pharmaceutical Design 34 (2018): 3998‐4006.
  21. Dwyer DB., et al. “Machine Learning Approaches for Clinical Psychology and Psychiatry”. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology 14 (2018): 91‐118.
  22. Vamathevan J., et al. “Applications of machine learning in drug discovery and development”. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 6 (2019): 463‐477.
  23. Lima AN., et al. “Use of machine learning approaches for novel drug discovery”. Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery 3 (2016): 225‐239.
  24. Rahimian F., et al. “Predicting the risk of emergency admission with machine learning: Development and validation using linked electronic health records”. PLoS Medicine11 (2018): e1002695.
  25. Rojas JC., et al. “Predicting Intensive Care Unit Readmission with Machine Learning Using Electronic Health Record Data”. Annals of the American Thoracic Society 7 (2018): 846‐853.
  26. Wang S., et al. “Using Electronic Health Records and Machine Learning to Predict Postpartum Depression”. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 264 (2019): 888‐892.
×

Citation

Citation: Raajasiri Iyengar and Gaurav. “Machine Learning in Multidimensional Biomarker Design: A Milestone in Precision Medicine - A Systematic Review". Acta Scientific Dental Sciences 4.11 (2020): 21-26.




Metrics

Acceptance rate30%
Acceptance to publication20-30 days
Impact Factor1.278

Indexed In





News and Events


  • Certification for Review
    Acta Scientific certifies the Editors/reviewers for their review done towards the assigned articles of the respective journals.
  • Submission Timeline for Upcoming Issue
    The last date for submission of articles for regular Issues is December 25, 2024.
  • Publication Certificate
    Authors will be issued a "Publication Certificate" as a mark of appreciation for publishing their work.
  • Best Article of the Issue
    The Editors will elect one Best Article after each issue release. The authors of this article will be provided with a certificate of "Best Article of the Issue"

Contact US









ff

© 2024 Acta Scientific, All rights reserved.