Abstract

  Replacement of teeth with periodontally compromised abutment is a challenge. A tough choice of aesthetics over function is often made by the operator for the satisfaction of the patient. The modified concepts of fixed partial dentures allow one to choose longevity of the prosthesis by not compromising on the aesthetic factors. Ridge defect often leads to a convenient treatment option of removable partial dentures which will not be preferred by the patient. Andrews bridge a fixed removable type of prosthesis is perfect solution for this situation. In long span multiple missing cases Nonrigid connectors have been recommended to reduce the forces as they provide a stress-breaking effect. In this case report, there are two opportunities that allow us to incorporate the modified fixed partial denture technique. Andrews bridge in the lower anterior segment to mask the ridge loss and the posterior long span FPD with a tenon mortise attachment. These two attachments used in this case not only prolongs the life of already compromised anterior teeth but also allows the posterior abutment to remain healthy throughout in long span fixed partial dentures.

Keywords: Andrews Bridge; Pier Abutments; Removable Fixed Prosthesis; Multiple Missing Teeth; Hader Bar; Tenon Mortis

References

1. Rosenstiel SF., et al. “History taking and clinical examination”. In: Contemporary Fixed Prosthodontics. 3^rd St. Louis: Mosby (2001): 514.
2. Abrams H., et al. “Incidence of anterior ridge deformities in partially edentulous patients”. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 57 (1987): 191-194.
3. Hawkins CH., et al. “Ridge contour related to esthetic and function”. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 66 (1991): 165-168.
4. Andrews JA and Biggs WF. “The Andrews bar-and-sleeve-retained bridge: A Clinical report”. Dent Today 18 (1999): 94-96.
5. Andrews JA. “The Andrews Bridge: A Clinical Guide”. Convington LA: Institute of Cosmetic Dentistry (1976): 3-7.
6. Everhart RJ and Cavazos E. “Evaluation of a fixed removable partial denture: Andrews bridge system”. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 50 (1983):180-184.
7. Fields H., et al. “Combination prosthesis for optimum aesthetic appearance”. Journal of the American Dental Association 101 (1980): 2276-2279.
8. Immeleus JE and Aramany M. “A fixed-removable partial denture for cleft palate patients”. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 34 (1975): 286-291.
9. Shillingburgh HT., et al. “Fundamental of fixed prosthodontics”. 3^rd edition Chicago: Quintessence (1997): 493-494.
10. Shillinburg HT Jr., et al. “Fundamental of Fixed Prosthodontics”. Chicago: Quintessence (2012): 91-92.
11. Akulwar RS and Kodgi A. “Non-rigid connector for managing pier abutment in FPD: A case report”. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research 8 (2014): ZD12-ZD13.
12. Shillingburg HT Jr and Fisher DW. “Nonrigid connectors for fixed partial dentures”. Journal of the American Dental Association 87 (1973): 1195-1199.
13. Mattoo K., et al. “Elucidating the problem of pier abutment through the use of a fixed movable prosthesis - A clinical case report”. International Journal of Dental Sciences and Research 2 (2014): 154-157.
14. Hazari P., et al. “Different techniques for management of pier abutment: Reports of three cases with review of literature”. Archives of Medicine and Health Sciences 4 (2016): 89-92.
15. Shillingburg HT Jr., et al. “Fundamentals of Fixed Prosthodontics”. 3^rd Chicago: Quintessence (1997): 85-118.
16. Oruc S., et al. “Stress analysis of effects of nonrigid connectors on fixed partial dentures with pier abutments”. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 99 (2008): 185-192.
17. Banerjee S., et al. “Non-rigid connector: The wand to allay the stresses on abutment”. Contemporary Clinical Dentistry 2 (2011): 351-354.
18. Picton DC. “Tilting movements of teeth during biting”. Archives of Oral Biology 7 (1962): 151.
19. Savion I., et al. “The pier abutment: A review of the literature and a suggested mathematical model”. Quintessence International 37 (2006): 345-352.
20. Moulding MB., et al. “An alternative orientation of nonrigid connectors in fixed partial dentures”. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 68 (1992): 236-238.

Citation

Citation: Sachin Chaware., et al. “Prosthetic Rehabilitation of Siebert’s Class II Case and Pier Abutments - Case Report”. Acta Scientific Dental Sciences 4.5 (2020): 52-59.

Copyright

Copyright: © 2020 Sachin Chaware., et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.