Abstract

  The aim of this study is to describe a clinical case about a young patient, 13 years old, that he has a big odontoma in the right site of the mandible associated with an impacted tooth. So, it was described a piezo surgery approach in order to obtain a conservative approach.

Keywords: Piezosurgery; Impacted Teeth; Odontoma

References

1. Srivastava P., et al. “Comparison of surgical outcome after imparted third molar surgery using piezotome and the conventional rotary handpiece”. Contemporary Clinical Dentistry 2 (2018): S318-S324.
2. Jiang Q and Qiu Y “Piezoelectric versus conventional rotary techniques for impacted third molar extraction. A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials”. Medicine (Baltimore)41 (2015): e1685.
3. Al-Moraissi EA. “Does the piezoelectric surgical technique produce fewer postoperative sequelae after lower third molar surgery than conventional rotary instruments? A systematic review and meta analysis”. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 3 (2016): 383-391.
4. Goyal M and Marya K. “Comparative evaluation of surgical outcome after removal of impacted mandibular third molars using a Piezotome or a conventional handpiece: a prospective study”. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 6 (2012): 556-561.
5. Benediktsdottir IS., et al. “Mandibular third molar removal risk indicators for extended operation time postoperative pain and complications”. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology 4 (2004): 438-446.
6. Oikarinen K. “Postoperative pain after mandibular third molar surgery”. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica 1 (1991): 7-13.
7. Rullo R., et al. “Piezoelectric device vs Conventional rotative instruments in impacted third molar surgery: Relationships between surgical difficulty and postoperative pain with histological evaluations”. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery 2 (2013): e33-e38.
8. Mantovani E., et al. “A split-mouth randomized clinical trial to evaluate the performance of piezosurgery compared with traditional technique in lower wisdom tooth removal”. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 10 (2014): 1890-1897.
9. Vercellotti T., et al. “The piezoelectric bony window osteotomy and sinus membrane elevation: introduction of a new technique for simplification of the sinus augmentation procedure”. International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry 6 (2001): 561-567.
10. Vercellotti T. “Technological characteristics clinical indications of piezoelectric bone surgery”. Minerva Stomatologica5 (2004): 207-214.
11. Di Alberti L., et al. “A comparative study of densitometry during osseointegration: piezoelectric surgery versus rotary protocols”. Quintessence International 8 (2010): 639-644.
12. Beziat JL., et al. “Ultrasonic osteotomy as a new technique in craniomaxillofacial surgery”. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 6 (2007): 493-500.

Citation

Citation: Cardarelli Angelo., et al. “Surgical Treatment of Impacted Tooth Associated with a Big Odontoma: Piezosurgery Approach”. Acta Scientific Dental Sciences 4.5 (2020): 48-51.

Copyright

Copyright: © 2020 Cardarelli Angelo., et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.