Trigulova R Kh* and Fozilov Kh G

Republican Specialized Scientific and Practical Medical Center of Cardiology, Tashkent, Uzbekistan

*Corresponding Author: Trigulova R Kh, Republican Specialized Scientific and Practical Medical Center of Cardiology, Tashkent, Uzbekistan.

Received: August 29, 2022; Published: September 28, 2022

Abstract

Today, the health care system accumulates and concentrates colossal material on the information of patients who are at the doctor's office, collected and accumulated from electronic medical records (EMR). The possibilities of EHR are not only enormous in clinical practice, but also have great potential for clinical research.

EHRs are a unique database from which information for large research projects can be obtained using various methods and methods.

One of the major application challenges for collaborative research in expanding the use of EMC are issues of semantic interoperability, privacy, and security.

Currently, consensus and standards of international associations involved in the development of protocols for the use of EHR have been formed, which can provide the semantics of clinical information and semantic compatibility between different systems.

When using EMR in clinical trials, a basic rule should apply. EHR can combine data from clinical trials from different centers according to the study protocol to allow identification of different study methods and different patient populations.

International standards for the interoperability of information structures published in recent years have made it possible to create such management systems that have the ability to record and exchange data between different groups of patients and clinics.

With the help of the created systems, it becomes possible to eliminate complications when using various clinical languages and styles of documentation, as well as unfinished routine records.

Keywords: Electronic Health Record; Unified Structure of Electronic Health Record; Numerous Studies; Compatibility

References

1. Kimberly A., et al. “Current use and costs of electronic health records for clinical trial research: a descriptive study”. CMAJ Open1 (2019): E23-E32.
2. Beck T., et al. “Knowledge engineering for health: a new discipline required to bridge the “ICT gap” between research and healthcare”. Human Mutation Variation, Informatics and Disease5 (2012): 797-802.
3. Laszlo Vasko., et al. “Smart Program Design Through a Common Information Model”. Therapeutic Innovation and Regulatory Science 1 (2015): 116-125.
4. Geissbuhler A., et al. “Trustworthy reuse of health data: a transnational perspective”. International Journal of Medical Informatics1 (2013): 1-9.
5. Jensen PB., et al. “Mining electronic health records: towards better research applications and clinical care”. Nature Reviews Genetics6 (2012): 395-405.
6. Innovative Medicines Initiative (IHI). Electronic Health Record Systems for Clinical Research (EHR4CR).
7. Desroches CM., et al. “Meeting meaningful use criteria and managing patient populations: a national survey of practicing physicians”. Annals of Internal Medicine 11 (2013): 791-799.
8. Hayrinen K., et al. “Definition, structure, content, use and impacts of electronic health records: a review of the research literature”. International Journal of Medical Informatics5 (2008): 291-304.
9. Weiskopf NG and Weng C. “Methods and dimensions of electronic health record data quality assessment: enabling reuse for clinical research”. JAMA1 (2013): 144-151.
10. De Moor G., et al. “Policy brief on the current status of certification of electronic Health Records in the US and Europe”. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 170 (2011): 83-106.
11. Hoerbst A and Ammenwerth E. “Electronic health records. A systematic. review on quality requirements”. Methods of Information in Medicine 4 (2010): 320-336.
12. Hoerbst A and Ammenwerth E. “Quality and Certification of Electronic Health Records: an overview of current approaches from the US and Europe”. Applied Clinical Informatics2 (2010): 149-164.
13. International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) Guideline for Good Clinical Practice (GCP) (2002).
14. McCormack JL and Ash JS. “Clinician perspectives on the quality of patient data used for clinical decision support: a qualitative study”. AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings 2012 (2012): 1302-1309.
15. Kimberly A., et al. “Using electronic health records for clinical trials: Where do we stand and where can we go?” CMAJ 5 (2019): E128-E133.
16. Black AD., et al. “The impact of eHealth on the quality and safety of health care: a systematic overview”. PLoS Medicine1 (2011): e1000387.
17. Weng C., et al. “Using EHRs to integrate research with patient care: promises and challenges”. JAMIA 5 (2012): 684-687.
18. Botsis T., et al. “Secondary use of EHR: data quality issues and informatics opportunities”. Summit on Translational Bioinformatics 2010 (2010): 1-5.
19. Kopcke F., et al. “Evaluation of data completeness in the electronic health record for the purpose of patient recruitment into clinical trials: a retrospective analysis of element presence”. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 13 (2013): 37.
20. Kahn MG., et al. “A pragmatic framework for single‐site and multisite data quality assessment in electronic health record‐based clinical research”. Medical Care 5 (2012): S21-29.
21. Ovretveit J., et al. “Continuous innovation: developing and using a clinical database with new technology for patient‐centred care-the case of the Swedish quality register for arthritis”. International Journal for Quality in Health Care 2 (2013): 118-124.
22. Coorevits P., et al. “Electronic health records: new opportunities for clinical research”. Journal of Internal Medicine6 (2013): 547-560.
23. Health informatics - Electronic health record communication - Part 1: Reference model (ISO 13606-1:2019). Irish Standard I.S. EN ISO 13606-1 (2019).

Citation

Citation: Trigulova R Kh and Fozilov Kh G. “The Possibility of Using Electronic Medical Records for Clinical Observation". Acta Scientific Cardiovascular System 1.5 (2022): 26-31.

Copyright

Copyright: © 2022 Trigulova R Kh and Fozilov Kh G. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.