Acta Scientific Nutritional Health (ASNH)(ISSN: 2582-1423)

Research Article Volume 4 Issue 10

Multisectoral Nutrition Implementation in Burkina Faso: Organization, Collaboration and Support of Contributing Sectors at Regional Level

Dieudonné Diasso1, Maimouna Halidou Doudouand Aly Savadogo1*

1Laboratory of Applied Biochemistry and Immunology, Center for Research in Biological Sciences of Food and Nutrition, Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Joseph KI-ZERBO University, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso
2Epidemiology, Bio-Statistics and Clinical Research Center, School of Public Health, Brussels, Belgium

*Corresponding Author: Aly Savadogo, Laboratory of Applied Biochemistry and Immunology, Center for Research in Biological Sciences of Food and Nutrition, Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Joseph KI-ZERBO University, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.

Received: August 31, 2020; Published: September 16, 2020

×

Abstract

  Among other aspects of nutrition capacities, the state of human, material, financial resources and technical structures’ organization in Burkina-Faso are not exhaustive nor assessed to date. The objective of this evaluation study was to analyze the various capacities of the contributing key sectors in nutrition of the Regional Directorates, and to identify gaps and challenges for their support to a successful implementation of the national nutrition plan. Tools and resources proposed by the Framework for Nutrition Capacity, recently developed by the United Nations Network for Scaling Up Nutrition was used with an adapted analytical framework. The methodology consisted on documentary reviews, data collection and analysis from evaluation surveys. Nearly 96% of Regional Directorates, in all key sectors, highlighted the unavailability of adequate skills to support the expansion of nutrition services. Only 17.6% of the Regional Directorates have nutrition training plan, against 79.7%. A certain number of external factors, which hindered the effective implementation of activities, was underlined by 60.8% of the technical structures, and the existence of an internal dialogue on nutrition within the Directorate is only effective in 23% of cases. The results show a strong involvement of the Regional Directorates in the Regional Food Security Councils, and moderate for the Regional Social Protection Units and low or even non-existent for the Regional Nutrition Consultation Councils. In a national context where dialogue and synergy between the different coordination bodies and stakeholders at the central level remain problematic, it is more necessary to reinforce nutrition regional dialogue around the governorate, in order to successfully scale up multisectoral interventions in the country.

Keywords: Capacity Assessment; Financial and Resource Mobilization; Human Resource; Nutrition; Organizational; Regional Directorate

×

References

  1. Forouzanfar MH., et al. “Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks in 188 countries, 1990‐2013: asystematic analysis for the global burden of disease study”. The Lancet 10010 (2013): 2287‐2323.
  2. Victora CG., et al. “For the Maternal and Child Undernutrition Study Group Maternal and child undernutrition: consequences for adult health and human capital”. The Lancet 371 (2008): 340-357.
  3. Dewey KG and Begum K. “Long-term consequences of stunting in early life”. Maternal Child Nutritions3 (2011): 5-18.
  4. Black RE., et al. “Maternal and Child Nutrition Study Group. Maternal and child undernutrition and overweight in low income and middle-income countries. The Lancet 9890 (2013): 427-451.
  5. Ministère de la santé. “Plan stratégique multisectoriel de nutrition (2020-2024)”. Burkina Faso (2019).
  6. Bezanson K and Isenman P. “Scaling up nutrition: a framework for action”. Food and Nutrition Bulletin1 (2010): 178.
  7. Pearson BL and Ljungqvist B. “REACH: An effective catalyst for scaling up priority nutrition interventions at the country level”. Food and Nutrition BulletinS2 (2011): 115S-127S.
  8. Ruel MT and Alderman H. “Nutrition-sensitive interventions and programmes: how can they help to accelerate progress in improving maternal and child nutrition?” The Lancet 9891 (2013): 536-551.
  9. Alderman H., et al. “Improving Nutrition through Multisectoral Approaches”. The World Bank (2013).
  10. World Health Organization. “Global Action Plan for the Prevention and Control of Noncommunicable Diseases 2013-2020” (2013).
  11. World Health Organization. “Comprehensive Implementation Plan on Maternal, Infant and Young Child Nutrition” (2014).
  12. Government of Mozambique. “Multisectoral Plan for Chronic Malnutrition Reduction in Mozambique 2011-2014”. Maputo (2010).
  13. Zon H., et al. “Municipal health services provision by local governments: a systematic review of experiences in decentralized Sub-Saharan African countries”. Health Policy Plan9 (2017): 1327-1336.
  14. Lapping K., et al. “Organizational Factors, Planning Capacity, and Integration Challenges Constrain Provincial Planning Processes for Nutrition in Decentralizing Vietnam”. Food Nutrition Bulletin3 (2014): 382-391.
  15. Gillespie S., et al. “The politics of reducing malnutrition: building commitment and accelerating progress”. The Lancet 9891 (2013): 552-569.
  16. Save the Children. “Nursing nutrition. Why we must invest in health workers to end maternal and child malnutrition”.
  17. Meek JW. “Editorial: complexity theory and administrative learning‐adaptive practices in complex governance systems”. Evolution of Complex Organs 1 (2014): 1.
  18. Murphy J., et al. “Managing the entanglement: complexity leadership in public sector systems”. Public Administration Review5 (2017): 692‐704.
  19. Patton MQ. “Developmental evaluation: Applying complexity concepts to enhance innovation and use”. New York, NY : Guilford Press (2011): 187.
  20. Alkin, MC. “Evaluation roots: Tracing theorists’ views and influences”. Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage (2004).
  21. Ridde V. “Suggestions d’amélioration d’un cadre conceptuel de l’évaluation participative”. Revue canadienne d’évaluation de programme2 (2006): 1-23
  22. Jacob S and Ouvrard L. “L’évaluation participative. Avantages et difficultés d’une pratique innovante”. Cahiers de la performance et de l’évaluation Automne (2009).
  23. King JA. “Making Sense of Participatory Evaluation Practice”. New Directions for Evaluation 80 (1998): 57-67.
  24. Greene JC. “Communication of Results and Utilization in Participatory Program Evaluation”. Evaluation and Program Planning4 (1988): 341-351.
  25. O’Sullivan RG and Agostino A. “Promoting Evaluation through Collaboration: Findings from Community-Based Programs for Young Children and their Families”. Evaluation 3 (2002): 372-387.
  26. United Nations Network. “Nutrition Capacity Assessment Guidance Package”. Part I Guidance Note (2016a): 36.
  27. Dozois E., et al. “Guide du praticien de l’évaluation évolutive”. Montréal, QC : La fondation de la famille J.W. McConnell et l’Institut international des droits de l’enfant et du développement (2010).
  28. Rey L., et al. “Les défis de l’évaluation Développementale en recherche : Une analyse d’implantation d’un Projet hôpital promoteur de santé”. The Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation1 (2013): 1-26.
  29. United Nations Network. “Nutrition Capacity Assessment. Tools and Resources”. Guidance Package - Part II (2016b): 34.
  30. Food and Agriculture Organization. “Approaches to Capacity Development in Programming Processes and Tools”. Module d'apprentissage 2, édition révisée (2015).
  31. Acosta AM and Fanzo J. “Fighting maternal and child malnutrition: analysing the political and institutional determinants of delivering a national multisectoral response in six countries: A Synthesis Paper”. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies (2012).
  32. Pelletier D., et al. “Boundary‐spanning actors in complex adaptive governance systems: The case of multisectoral nutrition”. International Journal of Health Planning and Management (2017): 1-27.
  33. Eileen Kennedy., et al. “Multisector Nutrition Program Governance and Implementation in Ethiopia: Opportunities and Challenges”. Food and Nutrition Bulletin4 (2015): 534-548
  34. Webb P., et al. “Measuring Nutrition Governance: An Analysis of Commitment, Capability, and Collaboration in Nepal”. Food and Nutrition Bulletin4S (2016): S170-S182.
  35. Hoey L and Pelletier DL. “Bolivia’s multisectoral Zero Malnutrition Program: Insights on commitment, collaboration, and capacities”. Food and Nutrition Bulletin2s (2011): S70-81.
  36. Du Plessis LM ., et al. ”What does an enabling environment for infant and young child nutrition look like at implementation level? Perspectives from a multi-stakeholder process in the Breede Valley Sub-District, Western Cape, South Africa”. BMC Public Health1 (2018): 240.
  37. Bossert TJ and Beauvais JC. “Decentralization of health system in Ghana, Zambia, Uganda and Philippines: a comparative analysis of decision space”. Health Policy and Planning 17 (2002): 14-31.
  38. Trübswasser U., et al. “Landscape analysis - Assessing countries' readiness to scale up nutrition actions in the WHO African region”. African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development4 (2012): 6260-6273.
  39. Sodjinou R., et al. “A systematic assessment of the current capacity to act in nutrition in West Africa: cross-country similarities and differences”. Global Health Action 7 (2014): 24763.
  40. Hodge J., et al. “Is There an Enabling Environment for Nutrition-Sensitive Agriculture in East Africa? Stakeholder Perspectives From Ethiopia, Kenya, and Uganda”. Food and Nutrition Bulletin4 (2015): 503-519.
  41. Van den BM., et al. “Is there an enabling environment for nutrition-sensitive agriculture in South Asia? Stakeholder perspectives from India, Bangladesh and Pakistan”. Food and Nutrition Bulletin2 (2015): 231-247.
  42. Pelletier D., et al. “The nutrition policy process: the role of strategic capacity in advancing national nutrition agendas”. Food and Nutrition Bulletin 32 (2011): S59-69.
  43. Pelletier D., et al. “Nutrition agenda setting, policy formulation and implementation: lessons from the Mainstreaming Nutrition Initiative”. Health Policy Planning 3 (2011): 1-13.
  44. Soura BD and Coulibaly SS. “Analyse du processus de décentralisation des services de santé en Côte d’Ivoire”. Médecine et Santé Tropicales 24 (2014): 151-156.
  45. Ouedraogo O., et al. “Planning Capacity, Determinants, and Challenges of Integrating Multisectoral Nutrition into Communal Development Plans in Burkina Faso”. Science Journal of Public Health3 (2019): 74-82.
×

Citation

Citation: Aly Savadogo., et al. “Multisectoral Nutrition Implementation in Burkina Faso: Organization, Collaboration and Support of Contributing Sectors at Regional Level".Acta Scientific Nutritional Health 4.10 (2020): 26-36.




Metrics

Acceptance rate30%
Acceptance to publication20-30 days
Impact Factor0.819

Indexed In





News and Events


  • Certification for Review
    Acta Scientific certifies the Editors/reviewers for their review done towards the assigned articles of the respective journals.
  • Submission Timeline for Upcoming Issue
    The last date for submission of articles for regular Issues is April 25, 2021.
  • Publication Certificate
    Authors will be issued a "Publication Certificate" as a mark of appreciation for publishing their work.
  • Best Article of the Issue
    The Editors will elect one Best Article after each issue release. The authors of this article will be provided with a certificate of “Best Article of the Issue”.
  • Welcoming Article Submission
    Acta Scientific delightfully welcomes active researchers for submission of articles towards the upcoming issue of respective journals.
  • Contact US