Acta Scientific Dental Sciences (ASDS)(ISSN: 2581-4893)

Research Article Volume 5 Issue 2

Assessment of Mandibular and Dental Arch Profiles in Subjects with Mandibular Third Molar Impaction

Asha V1*, Kim Upadhyay2 and Sow Bhagya Lakshmi3

1Reader, Master of Dental Surgery, The Oxford Dental College - Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, India
2Master of Dental Surgery, Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, India
3Senior Lecturer, Master of Dental Surgery, The Oxford Dental College - Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, India

*Corresponding Author: Asha V, Asha V, Reader, Master of Dental Surgery, The Oxford Dental College - Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, India.

Received: December 14, 2020; Published: January 18, 2021

×

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the normal size of the mandible and the difference of the dental arch length and the total teeth size space that is important for prevention of mandibular third molar impaction.

Method: 102 subjects were divided into two groups, based on the eruption of mandibular third molars. Impacted mandibular third molar (Group1) comprised of 50 subjects and the erupted (Group 2) comprised of 52 subjects. Mandibular length, width, index, total teeth size, dental arch length, dissimilarity in dental arch length and the total teeth size were assessed.

Results:  There was a significant difference in the dental arch length, difference of dental arch length and total teeth size among the 2 groups in both genders. A noteworthy contrast was seen in the mandibular length (P < 0.001), mandibular width (P < 0.001), dental arch length (P < 0.001), total teeth size (P - 0.002), difference in dental arch and total tooth size (P-0.001) between males and females. The normal sized mandible should have a length within the range of 13.5cm to 17.5cm for males and 13.0cm to 17.0 cm for females while normal dental arch-total teeth size difference range should be in the range of 0.40cm - 1.40 cm in males and 0.20cm -1.20cm in females for proper third molar positioning.

Conclusions: Based on the above findings, it may be justified to perform a preventive or therapeutic surgical removal of the lower third molars of the post pubertal patients whose parameters fall below these set values.

Keywords: Mandibular Third Molar; Impaction; Dental Arch Length; Mandibular Index

×

References

  1. Blondeau F and Daniel NG. “Extraction of impacted mandibular third molars: postoperative complications and their risk factors”. Journal of the Canadian Dental Association 73 (2007): 325.
  2. Phillips C., et al. “Recovery after third-molar surgery: the effects of age and sex”. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 138 (2010): 700.e1-700.8 discussion 700.e1-700.8.
  3. Kaya GS., et al. “Some Morphological Features Related To Mandibular Third Molar Impaction”. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry1 (2010): e50-55.
  4. Shokri A., et al. “Position of impacted mandibular third molar in different skeletal facial types: First radiographic evaluation in a group of Iranian patients”. Imaging Science in Dentistry 44 (2014): 61-65.
  5. Odusanya SA and Abayomi IO. “Third molar eruption among rural Nigerians”. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology 2 (1991): 151-154.
  6. Kruger E., et al. “Third molar outcomes from age 18 to 26: findings from a population-based New Zealand longitudinal study”. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, and Oral Radiology 2 (2001): 150-155.
  7. Bishara S and Andreasen G. “Third molars a review”. American Journal of Orthodontics 1 (1983): 83.
  8. Olayemi AB. “Assessment and determination of human mandibular and dental arch profiles in subjects with lower third molar impaction in Port Harcourt, Nigeria”. Annals of Maxillofacial Surgery 2 (2011): 126-130.
  9. Hugoson A and Kugelberg CF. “The prevalence of third molars in a Swedish population. An epidemiological study”. Community Dental Health 5 (1988): 121-138.
  10. Akinbami BO and Didia BC. “Analysis of body variables, mandible and dental arch variables in the prediction of lower third molar impaction”. Journal of Community Dental Practice 11 (2010): 1-10.
  11. Berge TI. “Inability to work after surgical removal of mandibular third molars”. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica 55 (1997): 64-69.
  12. Chiapasco M., et al. “Side effects and complications associated with third molar surgery”. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology4 (1993): 412-420.
  13. Juodzbalys G and Daugela P. “Mandibular Third Molar Impaction: Review of Literature and a Proposal of a Classification”. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 4 (2013).
  14. Chiapasco M., et al. “Side effects and complications associated with third molar surgery”. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology4 (1993): 412-420.
  15. Koerner KR. “The removal of impacted third molars. Principles and procedures”. Dental Clinics of North America 2 (1994): 255-278.
  16. Lilian H Karasawa., et al. “Cross-sectional study of correlation between mandibular incisor crowding and third molars in young Brazilians”. Medicina Oral, Patologia Oral y Cirugia Bucal 3 (2013): e505-e509.
  17. Bruce RA., et al. “Age of patients and morbidity associated with mandibular third molar surgery”. Journal of the American Dental Association 2 (1980): 240-245.
  18. National Institute of Health. “NIH consensus development conference for removal of third molars”. Journal of Oral Surgery 38 (1980): 235-236.
  19. Richardson ME. “Some Aspects Of Lower 3RD molar eruption”. Angle Orthodontist2 (1974).
  20. Ganss C., et al. “Prognosis of third molar eruption”. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology 76 (1993): 688-693.
  21. Bergström K and Jensen R. “Responsibility of the third molar for secondary crowding”. Dental Abstract 6 (1961): 544.
  22. Lytle JJ. “Etiology and indications for the management of impacted teeth”. Northwest Dentistry6 (1995): 23-32.
  23. Lakhani M J., et al. “Anterior Arch Crowding —A Possible Predictor For Mandibular Third Molar Impaction”. Journal of Ayub Medical College Abbottabad1 (2011).
  24. Schulhof RJ. “Third molars and orthodontic diagnosis”. Journal of Clinical Orthodontics 10 (1976): 272-281.
  25. Behbehani F., et al. “Prediction of mandibular third-molar impaction in adolescent orthodontic patients”. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 130 (2006): 47-55.
  26. Hattab F N., et al. “Radiographic evaluation of mandibular third molar eruption space”. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology 88 (1999): 285-291.
  27. Lindqvist B and Thilander B. “Extraction of third molars in cases of anticipated crowding in the lower jaw”. American Journal of Orthodontics 81 (1982): 130-139.
  28. Forsberg CM. “Tooth size, spacing, and crowding in relation to eruption or impaction of third molars”. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 94 (1988): 57-62.
  29. Ricketts RM., et al. “Third molar enucleation: diagnosis and technique”. Journal of the California Dental Association 4 (1976): 52-57.
  30. Zeli K and Nedeljkovi N. “Size of the lower third molar space in relation to age in Serbian population”. Vojnosanitetski pregled10 (2013): 923-928.
  31. Bugaighis I., et al. “An odontometric study of tooth size in normal, crowded and spaced dentitions”. Journal of Orthodontic Science 2 (2013): 95-100.
  32. Björk A., et al. “Mandibular growth and third molar impaction”. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica 14 (1956): 231-272.
  33. Bjork A. “Variations in the growth pattern of the human mandible: longitudinal radiographic study by the implant method”. Journal of Dental Research 42 (1963): 400-411.
  34. Capelli J. “Mandibular growth and third molar impaction in extraction cases”. Angle Orthodontist 61 (1991): 223-229.
  35. Hassan AH. “Cephalometric characteristics of Class II division 1 malocclusion in a Saudi population living in the western region”. Saudi Dental Journal 23 (2011): 23-27.
  36. Kaplan RG. “Some factors related to mandibular third molar impaction”. Angle Orthodontist 45 (1975): 153-158.
  37. Almpani K and Kolokitha O E. “Role of third molars in orthodontics”. World Journal of Clinical Cases 2 (2015): 132-140.
×

Citation

Citation: Asha V., et al. “Assessment of Mandibular and Dental Arch Profiles in Subjects with Mandibular Third Molar Impaction”. Acta Scientific Dental Sciences 5.2 (2021): 45-51.




Metrics

Acceptance rate33%
Acceptance to publication20-30 days
Impact Factor0.614

Indexed In



News and Events


  • Certification for Review
    Acta Scientific certifies the Editors/reviewers for their review done towards the assigned articles of the respective journals.
  • Submission Timeline for Upcoming Issue
    The last date for submission of articles for regular Issues is May 20, 2021.
  • Publication Certificate
    Authors will be issued a "Publication Certificate" as a mark of appreciation for publishing their work.
  • Best Article of the Issue
    The Editors will elect one Best Article after each issue release. The authors of this article will be provided with a certificate of “Best Article of the Issue”.
  • Welcoming Article Submission
    Acta Scientific delightfully welcomes active researchers for submission of articles towards the upcoming issue of respective journals.
  • Contact US