Abstract

Data Sources: The electronic databases AMED, Cinahl and Medline were searched up to September 2019. The Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) were searched up to September 2019. 

Review Methods: All English-language randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that included participants with a clinical diagnosis of cerebrovascular accident with motor relearning programme as an intervention and used at least one clinically relevant outcome measure were included. The review authors extracted and analyzed the data independently, using the Pedro scale to assess the methodological quality of each eligible study. 

Results: Although bobath also effectiveness among post stroke patients in activity daily living and quality of life motor relearning programme approach plays an important role.

Conclusion: The findings of this review suggest that motor relearning is very effective in improving stroke patient’s quality of life and activity daily living. 

Keywords: Patient Quality; Daily Living; Hemiplegic Stroke Patients

References

1. What is stroke.  National stroke association (2014). 
2. Veerbeek JM., et al. “What is the evidence for physical therapy poststroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis”. PLoS one 9.2 (2014): e87987. 
3. Carr JH and Shepherd RB. “Neurological rehabilitation: optimizing motor performance”. 2nd edn. Elsevier (2011).
4. Platz T. “Evidenzbasierte Armrehabilitation”. Der Nervenarzt 74.10 (2003): 841-849. 
5. Saberi F., et al. “Can mirror visual feedback improve sensory relearning outcomes following median/ulnar nerve repair?” International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation 25.10 (2018): 552-559. 
6. Immadi SK., et al. “Effectiveness of the Motor Relearning Approach in Promoting Physical Function of the Upper Limb after a Stroke”. International Journal of Physiotherapy 2.1 (2015): 386-390. 
7. Hesse S., et al. “Effect on arm function and cost of robot-assisted group therapy in subacute patients with stroke and a moderately to severely affected arm: a randomized controlled trial”. Clinical Rehabilitation 28.7 (2014):  637-647. 
8. Yamato TP., et al. “The PEDro scale had acceptably high convergent validity, construct validity, and interrater reliability in evaluating methodological quality of pharmaceutical trials”. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 86 (2017): 176-181. 
9. Geusgens C., et al. “Transfer of training effects in stroke patients with apraxia: An exploratory study”. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 16.2 (2006):  213-229. 
10. Zhang N., et al. “Effects of warming-reinforcing acupuncture combined with rehabilitation training on the early motor function of hemiparalysis patients caused by ischemic brain stroke: a randomized and controlled study”. Zhongguo Zhen Jiu Chinese Acupuncture and Moxibustion 30.6 (2010): 441.
11. Krutulytė G., et al. “Kineziterapijos metodų Bobath ir judesių mokymo programos efektyvumas reabilituojant ligonius”. sirgusius galvos smegenų insult (2003).
12. Langhammer B and Stanghelle JK. “Physiotherapy after stroke--a randomized controlled trial”. Tidsskrift for Den Norske Laegeforening: Tidsskrift for Praktisk Medicin, Ny Raekke 121.24 (2001): 2805.
13. Lord S., et al. “How feasible is the attainment of community ambulation after stroke? A pilot randomized controlled trial to evaluate community-based physiotherapy in subacute stroke”. Clinical Rehabilitation 22.3 (2008): 215-225. 
14. Nilsson L., et al. “Walking training of patients with hemiparesis at an early stage after stroke: a comparison of walking training on a treadmill with body weight support and walking training on the ground”. Clinical Rehabilitation 15.5 (2001):  515-527. 
15. Batool S., et al. “To compare the effectiveness of constraint induced movement therapy versus motor relearning programme to improve motor function of hemiplegic upper extremity after stroke”. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences 31.5 (2015):  1167-1171. 
16. Langhammer B and Stanghelle JK. “Bobath or Motor Relearning Programme? A comparison of two different approaches of physiotherapy in stroke rehabilitation: a randomized controlled study”. Clinical Rehabilitation 14.4 (2000):  361-369. 
17. El-Bahrawy M and El-Wishy A. “Efficacy of motor relearning approach on hand function in chronic stroke patients. A controlle randomized study”. Italian Journal of Physiotherapy 2.4 (2012): 121-127.
18. Chan DY., et al. “Motor relearning programme for stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial”. Clinical Rehabilitation 20.3 (2006): 191-200. 
19. Chen L., et al. “Comparison of Motor Relearning Program versus Bobath Approach for Prevention of Poststroke Apathy: A Randomized Controlled Trial”. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases 28.3 (2019): 655-664. 
20. The PEDro scale provides a more comprehensive measure of methodological quality than the Jadad scale in stroke rehabilitation literature”. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 58.7 (2005):  668-673.
21. Souza JA., et al. “Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on the rehabilitation of painful shoulder following a stroke: protocol for a randomized, controlled, double-blind, clinical trial”. Trials (2019): 20.
22. 'The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews”. Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine 2.1 (2009): 61. 
23. Langhammer B and Stanghelle JK. “Bobath or Motor Relearning Programme? A follow-up one and fouryears post stroke”. Clinical Rehabilitation 17.7 (2003):  731-734. 
24. Langhammer B and Stanghelle JK.  “Can Physiotherapy after Stroke Based on the Bobath Concept Result in Improved Quality of Movement Compared to the Motor Relearning Programme”. Physiotherapy Research International 16.2 (2011): 69-80. 

Citation

Citation: Tamilarasi Thiagaraja. “To Compare the Effectiveness of Motor Relearning Programme in Improving Patient Quality of Life and Activity Daily Living for Hemiplegic Stroke Patients”. Acta Scientific Orthopaedics 3.4 (2020): 06-15.

Copyright

Copyright: © 2020 Tamilarasi Thiagaraja. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.