BR Saikishore Kumar¹*, Jagadeesh Kumar EGA² and Suma Sanikommu³

¹Research Scholar, Chaitanya Deemed to be University, Telangana, India

*Corresponding Author: BR Saikishore Kumar, Research Scholar, Chaitanya Deemed to be University, Telangana, India.

Received: April 24, 2023; Published: September 08, 2023

Abstract

The one-pot combination of an objective particle in a similar response vessel is generally viewed as an effective methodology in manufactured natural science. Several one-pot syntheses of biologically active molecules, primarily employing organo catalytic methods, are discussed in this overview, along with their strengths and weaknesses. The pot-economy ideas presented here are not only applicable to catalysis but also to organometallic and organic reaction techniques in general. A synthesis that requires multiple steps could instead be carried out in a single reaction flask with a one-pot synthesis. Envision that a union including numerous means expects that you stir up the response at each step, then decontaminate and carry on the material to the following stage. During workup and/or purification, you will, of course, lose some materials regardless of how cautiously you move chemicals from flask to flask. As a result, I believe that the fact that it is less likely to lose material during workup and purification is the most significant advantage. The use of chemicals and solvents is cost-effective, which is the second benefit. If the reaction needs to be worked up at each step, you will almost always need to use solvents that will eventually go to waste. Multiple-step one-flask synthesis would only require final workup at the final step.

 Keywords: Synthesis; Envision; Regardless; Strengths and Weaknesses

References

1. “Cotton advisory board, Cotton Corporation of India” (2010).
2. Das DK., et al. “Effect of foliar application of different sources of Zn on the changes in Zn content, uptake and yield of rice”. (2004).
3. Gangadhar GA., et al. “Effect of micronutrients on the yield and uptake of sunflower”. (1992).
4. Jat JR and RK Mehra. “Effect of sulphur and zinc on yield, micronutrient content in and uptake by mustard on haplustepts”. (2007).
5. Sarkar S and NC Aery. “Effect of zinc on growth of soybean”. Indian (1990).
6. Panse VG and PV Sukhatme. “Statistical methods of Agricultural Workers”. ICAR Publication, New Delhi (1988).
7. Mortvedt JJ and Beaton JD. "Heavy Metal and Radionuclide Contaminants in Phosphate Fertilizers".
8. Kesler and Simon, Stephen and Simon. “Mineral Resources, Economics and the Environment” (2015).
9. G J Leigh. “The world's greatest fix: a history of nitrogen and agriculture”. (2004).
10. Chambers Albert and Sally Rutherford. "Voluntary Standards for the Fertilizer and Supplements Industry”. (2007).

Citation

Citation: BR Saikishore Kumar., et al. “One Pot Synthesis of Gluconate NPK Fertilizer its Utilization Efficiency in Agriculture". Acta Scientific Microbiology 6.10 (2023): 02-08.

Copyright

Copyright: © 2023 BR Saikishore Kumar., et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.