Acta Scientific Dental Sciences (ISSN: 2581-4893)

Research Article Volume 4 Issue 7

Digital Age Estimation Using Orthopatomograms in Indian Population: A Comparative Study

Ramakant Gupta1*, Swati Gupta2 and Manju Gupta3

1Head and Consultant, Department of Dental Services, Dr. Jatinder Gupta’s Gupta Clinic and Opticals, Haryana, India
2Senior Consultant, Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, Dr. Jatinder Gupta’s Gupta Clinic and Opticals, Haryana, India
3Director and Clinic coordinator, Dr. Jatinder Gupta’s Gupta Clinic and Opticals, Haryana, India

*Corresponding Author: Ramakant Gupta, Head and Consultant, Department of Dental Services, Dr. Jatinder Gupta’s Gupta Clinic and Opticals, Haryana, India

Received: April 02, 2020; Published: June 18, 2020

×

Abstract

Introduction:Orthopantomographs are non- destructive tool for age estimation by indirectly measuring the rate of secondary dentine deposition. Cameriere.,et al. introduced one such Europeanpopulation based method and modified by researchers for Indian population; but their applicability is yet to be assessed.

Aim and Objective:To assess the applicability of Cameriere’s method and its modification by Jeevan.,et al. Bebshet.,et al. for mandibular canines and Sexena, Jeevan.,et al,Juneja.,et al. for maxillary canines in an Indian population in Faridabad district of Haryana by evaluating the pulp/tooth ratio in canines on right side using digital orthopantomographs.

Materials and Methods:Digital orthopantomographs of 60 patients (30 males, 30 females, 16- 72 years) were selected by simple random sampling. Pulp and tooth areas were measured and their ratio was computed using computer software. Age was calculated using the Cameriere’s method and its modification by Jeevan.,et al,Bebshet.,et al,Sexena, Juneja.,et al.Mean absolute error (MAE) for each method was calculated for each method.

Result:The present study showed no recognisable difference in dental age assessed by all the methods. Overestimation of age with MAE <± 10 years was found in Indian population using all the methods.

Conclusion:Jeevan’s formula revealed least MAE and slightly more percentage of cases with errors < ± 10 years i.e. acceptable’’ age estimates than others, therefore, itis more applicable for Indian population.

Keywords: Dental Age Estimation; Digital Orthopantomographs; Radiographs

×

References

  1. Gupta S., et al. “Age estimation in Indian children and adolescents in the NCR region of Haryana: A comparative study”. Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences 3 (2015): 253.
  2. Limdiwala P., et al. “Age estimation by using dental radiographs”. Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences2 (2013): 118.
  3. Chandramala R. “Application of Kvaal’s Technique of Age Estimation on Digital Panoramic Radiographs”. Dentistry06 (2012).
  4. Zaher J., et al. “Age estimation from pulp/tooth area ratio in maxillary incisors among Egyptians using dental radiographic images”. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine 2 (2011): 62-65.
  5. Panchbhai A. “Dental radiographic indicators, a key to age estimation”. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology4 (2011): 199-212.
  6. Singaraju S., et al. “Age estimation using pulp/tooth area ratio: A digital image analysis”. Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences1 (2009): 37.
  7. Veera S., et al. “Coronal pulp biomarker: A lesser known age estimation modality”. Journal of Indian Academy of Oral Medicine and Radiology4 (2014): 398.
  8. Ayad CE., et al. “Estimation of Age for Sudanese Adults using Orthopantomographs”. Global Journal of Medical Research: Journal Dentistry and Otolaryngology1 (2014).
  9. Cameriere R., et al. “Age Estimation by Pulp/Tooth Ratio in Canines by Peri-Apical X-Rays”. Journal of Forensic Sciences 1(2007): 166-170.
  10. Kvaal SI., et al. “Age estimation of adults from dental radiographs”. Forensic Science International 74 (1995): 175-
  11. Cameriere R., et al. “Variations in Pulp/Tooth Area Ratio as an Indicator of Age: a Preliminary Study”. Journal of Forensic Sciences2 (2004): 1-3.
  12. Bagh T., et al. “Age Estimation using Cameriere’s Seven Teeth Method with Indian Specific Formula in South Indian Children”. International Journal of Advanced Health Sciences 2 (2014): 1-10.
  13. Jeevan M., et al. “Age estimation by pulp/tooth area ratio in canines: Cameriere's method assessed in an Indian sample using radiovisiography”. Forensic Science International 1-3 (2011): 209.e1-209.e5.
  14. Babshet M., et al. “Age estimation in Indians from pulp/tooth area ratio of mandibular canines”. Forensic Science International 1-3 (2010): 125.e1-125.e4.
  15. Babshet M., et al. “Age estimation from pulp/tooth area ratio (PTR) in an Indian sample: A preliminary comparison of three mandibular teeth used alone and in combination”. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine8 (2011): 350-354.
  16. Saxena S. “Age estimation of indian adults from orthopantomographs”. Brazilian Oral Research 3 (2011): 225-229.
  17. Juneja M., et al. “Age estimation using pulp/tooth area ratio in maxillary canines A digital image analysis”. Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences 3 (2014): 160-165.
  18. Spalding KL., et al. “Age written in teeth by nuclear tests”. Nature15(2005): 333-334.
  19. Cameriere R., et al. “Accuracy of age estimation in children using radiograph of developing teeth”. Forensic Science International2-3 (2008): 173-177.
  20. Solheim T., et al. “Dental age estimation of Norwegian adults: a comparison of different methods”. Forensic Science International 1 (1980): 7-17.
  21. Reppien K., et al. “Evaluation of post-mortem estimated dental age versus real age: A retrospective 21-year survey”. Forensic Science International 159 (2006): S84-S88.
  22. Acharya A., et al. “Effectiveness of Bang and Ramm’s formulae in age assessment of Indians from dentin translucency length”. The International Journal of Legal Medicine 6(2009): 483-488.
  23. Kasetty S., et al. “Dental Cementum in Age Estimation: A Polarized Light and Stereomicroscopic Study”. Journal of Forensic Sciences 3 (2010): 779-783.
  24. Kaur P., et al. “Estimation of age based on tooth cementum annulations: A comparative study using light, polarized, and phase contrast microscopy”. Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences 7 (2015): 215-221.
  25. Pundir S., et al. “Estimation of age based on tooth cementum annulations using three different microscopic methods”. Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences 1(2009): 82-87.
  26. Bodecker CF. “A consideration of some of the changes in the teeth from young to old age”. Dental Cosmos 67 (1925): 543-
  27. Paewinsky E., et al. “Quantification of secondary dentin formation from orthopantomograms. A contribution to forensic age estimation methods in adults”. The International Journal of Legal Medicine 119 (2005): 27-
×

Citation

Citation: Ramakant Gupta., et al. “Digital Age Estimation Using Orthopatomograms in Indian Population: A Comparative Study”. Acta Scientific Dental Sciences 4.7 (2020): 46-51.



Member In





News and Events


  • Certification for Review
    Acta Scientific certifies the Editors/reviewers for their review done towards the assigned articles of the respective journals.
  • Submission Timeline for Upcoming Issue
    The last date for submission of articles for regular Issues is September 30, 2020.
  • Publication Certificate
    Authors will be issued a "Publication Certificate" as a mark of appreciation for publishing their work.
  • Best Article of the Issue
    The Editors will elect one Best Article after each issue release. The authors of this article will be provided with a certificate of “Best Article of the Issue”.
  • Welcoming Article Submission
    Acta Scientific delightfully welcomes active researchers for submission of articles towards the upcoming issue of respective journals.
  • Contact US