Acta Scientific Dental Sciences (ISSN: 2581-4893)

Research Article Volume 4 Issue 3

Pattern and Prevalence of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Prescription in Tehran, Iran, From 2013 To 2016

Alireza Toghyani, Shahriar Shahab, Zeynab Azizi* and Amitis Sarbaz

Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran

*Corresponding Author: Zeynab Azizi, Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran.

Received: January 30, 2020; Published: February 13, 2020



Background: Dental images are an integral part of diagnosis and treatment of many oral diseases. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is more accurate and has less side effects than the conventional imaging methods. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of CBCT prescription and changes in prescription trend from 2013 to 2016 in patients referring to a private oral and maxillofacial radiology clinic.

Materials and Methods: This descriptive study evaluated 9624 cases of CBCT referrals for the reason of referral, source of refer, and patient’s age and sex. The pattern of prescribing CBCT was evaluated over four years based on the source of refer and reason of imaging. Data were analyzed by using SPSS software through ANOVA tests (P < 0.05).

Results: Out of the studied patients, 45.6% were men and 54.4% were women, with an average age of 47.5 years. The most frequent reason for CBCT prescription was implant site evaluation (94.5%), followed by endodontic reasons (1%). Frequency of other reasons was less than 1%. The patients were most commonly referred by general dentists (37.4%), periodontist (31.1%) and maxillofacial surgeons (21.9%), respectively. An increasing trend was noted in CBCT prescription by both general dentists and specialists for all purposes.

Conclusion: Seemingly, the dentists' knowledge is not adequate about the potential advantages of CBCT imaging system and its superiority over the conventional imaging methods. Therefore, improving the academic level of dental curriculum and educational programs in this regard should be emphasized.

Keywords: Cone Beam Computed Tomography; Oral Radiology; Panoramic Radiography; Prescription Pattern; Prescription Prevalence



  1. Scarfe WC., et al. “Clinical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in dental practice”. Journal of the Canadian Dental Association 72 (2006): 75-80.
  2. Razavi H., et al. “Investigating frequency of reasons for referring to cbct in a private imaging center in yazd from 2010 to 2012”. Journal of Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences 21 (2013): 370-377.
  3. Guerrero ME., et al. “State-of-the-art on cone beam ct imaging for preoperative planning of implant placement”. Clinical Oral Investigations 10 (2006): 1-7.
  4. Kobayashi K., et al. “Accuracy in measurement of distance using limited cone-beam computerized tomography”. The International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 19 (2004): 228-231.
  5. Closmann JJ and Schmidt BL. “The use of cone beam computed tomography as an aid in evaluating and treatment planning for mandibular cancer”. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 65 (2007): 766-771.
  6. Smith MH., et al. “Anterior mandibular lingual salivary gland defect: A report of a case diagnosed with cone-beam computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging”. Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology and Endodontology 103 (2007): e71-e8.
  7. Tsiklakis K., et al. “Radiographic examination of the temporomandibular joint using cone beam computed tomography”. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology 33 (2004): 196-201.
  8. Kau CH RS., et al. “Three-dimensional cone beam computerized tomography in orthodontics”. Journal of Orthodontics 32 (2005): 282-293.
  9. Pohlenz P., et al. “Major mandibular surgical procedures as an indication for intraoperative imaging”. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 66 (2008): 324-329.
  10. Roman R., et al. “The use of reformatted cone beam ct images in assessing mid-face trauma, with a focus on the orbital floor fractures”. Clujul Medical 89 (2016): 519-524.
  11. Scarfe WC. “Imaging of maxillofacial trauma: Evolutions and emerging revolutions”. Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology and Endodontology 100 (2005): S75-S96.
  12. Weiss R and Read-Fuller A. “Cone beam computed tomography in oral and maxillofacial surgery: An evidence-based review”. Dentistry Journal (Basel) 7 (2019): 52.
  13. Ziegler C., et al. “Clinical indications for digital volume tomography in oral and maxillofacial surgery”. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology 31 (2002): 126-130.
  14. Eggers G., et al. “Detection of foreign bodies of the head with digital volume tomography”. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology 34 (2005): 74-79.
  15. Wortche R., et al. “Clinical application of cone beam digital volume tomography in children with cleft lip and palate”. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology 35 (2006): 88-94.
  16. Akdeniz BG., et al. “Accuracy of proximal caries depth measurements: Comparison between limited cone beam computed tomography, storage phosphor and film radiography”. Caries Research 40 (2006): 202-207.
  17. Kalathingal SM., et al. “In vitro assessment of cone beam local computed tomography for proximal caries detection”. Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology and Endodontology 104 (2007): 699-704.
  18. Arnheiter C., et al. “Trends in maxillofacial cone-beam computed tomography usage”. Oral Radiology 22 (2006): 80-85.
  19. Tsiklakis K., et al. “Dose reduction in maxillofacial imaging using low dose cone beam ct”. European Journal of Radiology 56 (2005): 413-417.
  20. Cohnen M., et al. “Radiation dose in dental radiology”. European Radiology 12 (2002): 634-637.
  21. Pharoah M. “Oral radiology: Principles and interpretation”. St Louis: Mosby Elsevier (2009): 448-452. 
  22. Kayaoglu G., et al. “Root and canal symmetry in the mandibular anterior teeth of patients attending a dental clinic: Cbct study”. Brazilian Oral Research 29 (2015): 1-7.
  23. Aminsobhani M., et al. “Evaluation of the root and canal morphology of mandibular permanent anterior teeth in an iranian population by cone-beam computed tomography”. Journal of Dentistry (Tehran) 10 (2013): 358-366.
  24. Kaya S., et al. “Cone-beam dental computerized tomography for evaluating changes of aging in the dimensions central superior incisor root canals”. Medicina Oral, Patologia Oral Y Cirugia Bucal 16 (2011): e463-e466.
  25. Miles DA. “Clinical experience with cone-beam volumetric imaging—report of findings in 381 cases”. Computed Tomography 20 (2005): 416-424.
  26. Shinoda K., et al. “Annual report of limited cone beam computed tomography (3d accu-i-tomo) from 3000 cases at nihon university dental hospital in 2003”. International Congress Series (2004).
  27. 12th Congress of Iranian Maxillofacial Radiology Association. Tehran (2019).


Citation: Zeynab Azizi., et al. “Pattern and Prevalence of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Prescription in Tehran, Iran, From 2013 To 2016”.Acta Scientific Dental Sciences 4.3 (2020): 36-41.

Member In

News and Events

  • Certification for Review
    Acta Scientific certifies the Editors/reviewers for their review done towards the assigned articles of the respective journals.
  • Submission Timeline for Upcoming Issue
    The last date for submission of articles for regular Issues is October 15, 2020.
  • Publication Certificate
    Authors will be issued a "Publication Certificate" as a mark of appreciation for publishing their work.
  • Best Article of the Issue
    The Editors will elect one Best Article after each issue release. The authors of this article will be provided with a certificate of “Best Article of the Issue”.
  • Welcoming Article Submission
    Acta Scientific delightfully welcomes active researchers for submission of articles towards the upcoming issue of respective journals.
  • Contact US